Which Bible Translation Do You Prefer?

Discussion in 'Sacred Scripture' started by coton boy, Aug 11, 2015.

  1. Liturgyworks

    Liturgyworks Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    538
    Likes Received:
    254
    Country:
    US
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    Maybe there are Catholic study Bibles available with that level of detailed annotation, but the noted that come with the standard Challoner Douay Rheims are fewer than those in the Geneva; they can be ignored. Otherwise it would not be one of my favourite Bibles.

    Oh, and I did it again, I forgot to expand a footnote.

    For those who noticed the * in my post on my three favorite bibles, during what we might call the Preface of Venting about Oxbridge (which normally I am disinclined to vent about, because I love the books they publish and my father went to Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar in the 1950s, and being an Anglophile and a Posh Anglophile at that, I love Eton, Oxford, Cambridge and what they stand for), the remark was that it amuses me that despite not actually being in England or the United Kingdom, and having historically been a part of the Kingdom of Scotland, the Isle of Man is part of the Province of York, the Diocese of Sodor and Man, hence the fictional railway-saturated Isle of Sodor from the imagination of the Anglican priest Rev. W. Audrey, author of Thomas the Tank Engine and so on.

    But not as amusing as the fact that the formal title for a senior judge, jurist or member of the judiciary on the Island of Man is a Deemer, and I believe their chief justice is the Chief Deemer. I deem this guilty of being hilarious.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2019
    Brigid likes this.
  2. mediaque

    mediaque Member

    Posts:
    93
    Likes Received:
    68
    Country:
    United States
    Religion:
    Anglo-Catholic (TEC)
    I really like the MEV and the KJVER. But of coarse, I always have the KJV as reference of the afor mentioned just in case, of passages I want to check for accuracy.
     
    Liturgyworks likes this.
  3. Religious Fanatic

    Religious Fanatic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    621
    Likes Received:
    260
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian
    A lot of Douay's footnotes can be reconciled into a non-Romanist point of view, as with Geneva's Reformed commentary. It's honest enough to mention that passages like 1 John 5 and Revelation 12 may not mean what the RCCs sometimes say they mean. What offends me about the NAB is the liberal footnotes which has been mentioned many times by Catholics. The translation is supposed to be done by a 99% Catholic committee with the intention that it'll also be read by Protestants, and also that it is approved by the Vatican for all categories of use within the church. However, it has notes that offend even practicing Catholics (denies 1 Corinthians 3:15 speaks of purgatory despite being a prooftext in the catechism) and some that imply biblical errancy, like saying the Jewish view of the world is outdated when it speaks of water inside of the Earth which from what I understand was scientifically proven not too long ago. I've heard Catholics say, "Even Mormons and Jehovahs would be offended by it." If the Vatican's view of fostering ecumenism with us is that we be perceived as massive heretics to this degree from the start, then they went further than they should. Also, modern Catholic bibles accept the protestant renderings regarding verses pertaining to Mary like "full of grace" vs "favored one" which were originally points of contention.
     
  4. bwallac2335

    bwallac2335 Active Member

    Posts:
    161
    Likes Received:
    81
    Religion:
    Methodist
    I have got to get me a new Bible soon. Not sure why but I just feel that I do. I am leaning towards the Orthdox Study Bible.
     
    Liturgyworks likes this.
  5. Religious Fanatic

    Religious Fanatic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    621
    Likes Received:
    260
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian
    I have Hendrickson Publishing's fascimile of the original 1611 KJV with Apocrypha. They also offer one for the 1560 Geneva. I love traditional bibles, and anything published before pre-modern liberal scholarship is cool with me. I only use modern translations that stay close to the traditional ones as much as possible, like, as I said, New King James. I have a beautiful Douay-Rheims by Loreto publishing, and I want the Orthodox Study Bible. So once I get my hands on the Geneva fascimile and the OSB, we can reasonably say that I have several bibles from important competing groups as complimentary witnesses (Anglican, Roman, Orthodox, and Reformed Protestant).
     
    Juliana and Liturgyworks like this.
  6. Liturgyworks

    Liturgyworks Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    538
    Likes Received:
    254
    Country:
    US
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    Get a vintage American Bible Society New Testament as well. One from the 1950s or 60s, with psalms, hymns and prayers in the appendix, or a pocket Gideon new testament with the Psalter and the Proverbs if you cannot find the former.
     
  7. Religious Fanatic

    Religious Fanatic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    621
    Likes Received:
    260
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian
    I was blessed with a full Gideon hardcover NKJV that my mom brought home to me from a hotel while on vacation. I was stunned. She had no idea that I was looking for that specific version of the NKJV around the same time, when I ordered a Pocket Gideon NKJV with Proverbs/Psalms. That gave me a complimentary set. I had just purchased the Young Messiah film, which speculates on the childhood of Jesus. Knowing there could be possible heretical liberties, I suggested on reading the Gospel of Luke's chapters on those matters with my grandmother before viewing the film, so as to establish what is known from a biblical basis.
     
  8. Liturgyworks

    Liturgyworks Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    538
    Likes Received:
    254
    Country:
    US
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    The film in question is heretical, being a sanitized version of the Protoevangelion of Thomas and furthermore having a premise which is either Arian or at least Nestorian.
     
  9. Rhys

    Rhys Member

    Posts:
    31
    Likes Received:
    32
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Methodist
    While I recognize the deficiencies of Textus Receptus and applaud the ongoing academic effort to 'recover' the original Greek New Testament, my primary concern has shifted away from fidelity to the critical text and toward avoiding the pernicious influence of the current era - at all costs. The King James Bible did not fail our fathers who, unlike us, did not have instant access to dictionaries, commentaries, concordances, and hundreds of translations to help guide them through the text. The Gospel was preached, believers were edified, and Christ was proclaimed. You can 'debate' modern 'scholars' 'til you're blue in the face but in the end, they'll just out-print ya. Four centuries of tradition! The world can't ever take it away.
     
  10. Religious Fanatic

    Religious Fanatic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    621
    Likes Received:
    260
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian
    Very true, very true. Like I said, KJV and if you need some help, NKJV. I got myself a copy of a greek Nestle-Aland New Testament and look forward to learning some greek to study it in-depth. It includes both early and later traditions of the texts, but indicates where they do or don't occur in the notes explained by the preface.
     

Share This Page