Thoughts on mortal sin/venial sin

Discussion in 'Philosophy, Truth, and Ethics' started by Lowly Layman, Aug 30, 2015.

  1. Rexlion

    Rexlion Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,406
    Likes Received:
    1,194
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican Christian
    I think Brigid is correct, considering their theology.

    My own feeling is that Jesus was acting in obedience to His Father, and may have assumed that His mother should know where He was (and possibly a bit perplexed that she hadn't prayed and heard from the Father where He was). I do think it was a mild rebuke to call her "woman" rather than "Mother" particularly when He was only twelve; yet, being that He was the Son of God, I see no sin there.
     
  2. Religious Fanatic

    Religious Fanatic Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    610
    Likes Received:
    301
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian
    A man must obey his parents according to Jewish law, but a wife must obey her husband first and even though Christ was born of Mary as a virgin, his father's authority still mattered more.
     
    Rexlion likes this.
  3. Liturgyworks

    Liturgyworks Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    765
    Likes Received:
    439
    Country:
    US
    Religion:
    Christian Orthodoxy
    I have always been taught that the word is an honorific in the first century usage, equivalent to calling someone Ma’am today.
     
    Thomas Didymus likes this.
  4. Liturgyworks

    Liturgyworks Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    765
    Likes Received:
    439
    Country:
    US
    Religion:
    Christian Orthodoxy
    Indeed so. I am not advocating Novatianism, Donatism or Pelagianism, all closely related heresies; rather I subscribe to the Entire Sanctification, or Christian Perfection doctrine of John Wesley, and to Theosis, the Eastern soteriological model on which it is based.
     
    Brigid likes this.