I saw a lot written about that, both here and on CAF itself. I guess the changeover didn't make an impression on me, since websites change appearance all the time. It just felt there like nothing ever got settled. I have a strong interest in liturgy and sacred music, and a deep disdain for that terrible state of much Catholic worship today (and the resultant damage to the Body Catholic - lex orrandi, lex credendi), but I never did see a fruitful discussion on the subjects on CAF. There was also a great deal of accusations in the general form of "don't you know you should view those people and things you disagree with in the most charitable light, you terrible hateful monster?!" Lots of logs in many eyes.
That’s a big change then from when I was there, closer to 2014-2013, when the common response to someone like me was, Quiet you heretic, know your place when the catholics are in the room.
Yeah, both attitudes existed side by side, sometimes in the same thread. It was maddening. Maybe I was part of the problem as well - when every thread is contentious, it can bring out the worst in people.
All I ever saw when I looked at Catholic Answers forum is a bunch of people who claim to know the catechism pointing fingers and saying the other is a heretic that doesn't know how to interpret it.
I have seen the toxicity on CAF, too. I believe there is a reason for it there and not here at AF. I could be wrong but I think Anglicans are used to a much broader church than Roman Catholics. We Anglicans range from those who appear indistinguishable from Evangelical Protestant churches, both the liberal and more conservative ones, to those who are bearly different from very traditional Catholics with the exception (usually) of Latin. There is everything inbetween. Whilst we have our own preferred churchmanship Anglicans, it seems to me, are more tolerant of other styles of churchmanship. The toxicity on CAF seemed to me to be between those Roman catholics who class themselves as traditionalists, prefer Latin than the vernacular, only like polyphonic music, want Mass and other liturgies in the Extraordinary Form and refer, pejoratively, to the Ordinary Form as the Novus Ordo. On the other pole are those Catholics who have fully embraced Vatican II and may be even do not think it goes far enough. I think both of these camps are not used to the idea of a broad church as we have in Anglicanism. As a result both camps are firmly entrenched and there can often be a lack of charity between the two.