I am curious if anyone here (especially those of us in the U.S. or Canada) use the 1662 BCP (for the Daily Offices, for devotional purposes, etc.)? If so, how does its use compare with what is the standard approved text in your jurisdiction? Is it jarring at all (i.e., traditional vs. contemporary language, different Collects/Gospels, etc.)? If not, what would be the problem with “winding back the clock”, so to speak, and eliminating the option-itis that took hold pretty much everywhere in the latter half of the XXth century? Why continue the process of revision (i.e., using the American 1928 or 1979 as a baseline for proposed revisions), rather than simply returning to the original?