"The End Of Roman Catholicism" -article by an RCC traditionalist

Discussion in 'Non-Anglican Discussion' started by Stalwart, Jan 11, 2019.

  1. Stalwart

    Stalwart Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    2,723
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Country:
    America
    Religion:
    Anglican
    It's the famous article re-printed in the Italian press in May of 2018 by a famous traditionalist Roman Catholic intellectual (Sandro Magister). The title speaks for itself:

    "The End of Roman Catholicism"
    http://magister.blogautore.espresso...s-reform-was-written-before-by-martin-luther/

    It begins as follows: "At this point in the pontificate of Francis, I believe it can be reasonably maintained that this marks the twilight of that imposing historical reality which can be defined as “Roman Catholicism.”

    This does not mean, properly understood, that the Catholic Church is coming to an end, but that what is fading is the way in which it has historically structured and represented itself in recent centuries."



    Thoughts?
     
  2. Botolph

    Botolph Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    2,529
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    It reminds me of that other question I keep asking, 'would Martin Luther have been at odds with a Vatican II Church and Pope?'
     
    Shane R likes this.
  3. Peteprint

    Peteprint Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    724
    Likes Received:
    718
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    High-Church Laudian
    Not sure about the validity of such observations. Can we say that the Roman Catholic Church of the 4th century was the same as the RCC of the 12th? The point I am making is that the RCC (as with any church) has been, and will be, changing over time. That is natural and to be expected. I don't personally believe that what has transpired under Francis comes anywhere close to the changes that occurred at the time of Vatican II.

    Most (not all) of the changes I have seen in the RCC over the past century have been for the better.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2019
  4. Brigid

    Brigid Active Member Anglican

    Posts:
    161
    Likes Received:
    100
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    AngloCatholic
    The changes I would need to see to alter it back to the 4th century church is the belief in papal supremacy and infallibility, infallibility of the ordinary magisterium, works justification and many canon laws.
     
  5. Shane R

    Shane R Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    1,138
    Likes Received:
    1,181
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Anglican
    Many pine for the days of Benedict. And yet, he had appointed about 1/2 of the cardinal electors that gave the world Francis. What does that say about the Roman system?

    The attached article was a bit vitriolic. One would think Francis was on the verge of uniting with the Porvoo Communion after reading that. Sure, Francis is a dope who was brought up on liberation theology and can't really connect with the European church. But that fact limits his influence. He might even essentially hand-pick his successor since he has appointed nearly 60% of the sitting cardinal electors. But the Roman church changes at a pace only slightly less glacial than the various Orthodox churches. Witness the rise of Ad Orientem celebration despite Francis' wishes.
     
  6. Stalwart

    Stalwart Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    2,723
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Country:
    America
    Religion:
    Anglican
    I think that's overstating it. The same Roman church has changed its doctrine on capital punishment, and on communion for divorced and remarried, in just the last 2 years.

    Benedict was and is a modernist, even if slightly less. He has endorsed the modernist understanding of the Scriptures and the Resurrection in 2008 Synod of Bishops, paving the road for denying the literal veracity thereof in the future Roman developments -- such as, in 2016 denying Jesus' literal words that "what God has put together let no man put asunder", and in 2017 denying the literal text of Scripture that "he who lives by the sword shall die by the sword".

    That's just a North American phenomenon, fueled by exiles from the Episcopal Church and liberal Protestant denominations. There is no ad orientem rise in the Netherlands, or Brazil, or the Philippines, or the Congo.

    And even this "rise" is microscopic in dimension, namely one-two bishops have endorsed it.

    And even that Francis can squash like a cockroach any time he wishes.
     
    Brigid and Peteprint like this.
  7. JoeLaughon

    JoeLaughon Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    363
    Likes Received:
    320
    Country:
    United States
    Religion:
    ACNA
    Most of it, is my guess.
     
  8. Fidei Defensor

    Fidei Defensor Active Member

    Posts:
    266
    Likes Received:
    131
    Country:
    Kingdom of Heaven
    Religion:
    Christian
    Probably not much, Vatican II still upholds the pope’s position as Vicar of Christ, while Martin Luther called him the antichrist, “my soul is now at peace that I know the pope is antichrist.” In addition, indulgences still exist, the main reason for the 95 Thesis. I bought a St. Benedict Crucifix at a Catholic store that had a card that reads, “this indulgence blessed by the holy Father Francis.”

    More than that Luther believed in the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9, Revelation 1:5-6) oppose to the RCC view of priests being ordained and part of ecclesia, while all others are laity. Luther taught clergy can marry, while Rome holds that all clergy must be celibate. Luther taught Sola Scriptura (Scripture Alone), while Rome Catholic Church teaches Prima Scriptura (Scripture and Tradition).

    Luther teaches in His Small Catechism that there is only two Sacraments: Holy Baptism and Eucharist, while the Latin Church teaches there is Seven Sacraments of Holy Baptism, The Eucharist, Confession, Confirmstion, Holy Orders, Matrimony, and Anointing thd Sick.