Comment at the end of bible reading

Discussion in 'Questions?' started by Mark Carrigher, Jul 18, 2019.

  1. Mark Carrigher

    Mark Carrigher New Member

    Posts:
    24
    Likes Received:
    18
    Country:
    England
    Religion:
    C of E
    Hi all, more questions I'm afraid. When following the daily office home alone, especially evening prayer, should I say a phrase at the end of the Bible readings even if they are not written in the text of the daily office? I've noticed on Sunday's we say here endeth the epistle or this is the word of lord, thanks be to god. Should I/ could I say this after each offices reading or something similar?
     
  2. Botolph

    Botolph Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    2,529
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    There are a couple of offerings I have,
    • Lord in the darkness, let your light shine
    • May you word live in me and bear much fruit to your glory
    Sometimes a particular reading may simply evoke a line from and hymn or psalm. Use that. Try to be settled in the office, and let your responses be authentic. When we pray the office with others, clearly there is a great advantage is saying the common text, which is not so compelling when you are on your own.
     
    Mark Carrigher likes this.
  3. Stalwart

    Stalwart Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    2,723
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Country:
    America
    Religion:
    Anglican
  4. Fr. Brench

    Fr. Brench Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    242
    Likes Received:
    351
    Country:
    United States
    Religion:
    Anglican (ACNA)
    For private recitation of the Office, you don't "need" to make an announcement about the reading you just read. I sometimes pause and say "thanks be to God", but it's not a big deal.
     
    Rexlion and Mark Carrigher like this.
  5. Rexlion

    Rexlion Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    2,122
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian attending ACNA
    "Could" and "should" are vastly different here. You can (could) say anything that you have on your mind or in your heart; you have liberty in Christ and can express joy, gratefulness, anything, or nothing. (If I had just read one of the genealogy passages, I'm sure I'd be inclined to say nothing of significance!) As for "should," which implies a requirement or at very least a certain level of 'religiously correct' appropriateness, I think that would elevate form over substance; when you are alone with God in prayer (communication) or in the Word, there is no reason to be PC (or RC) ;) because I don't think God stands on formality. :D
     
  6. Botolph

    Botolph Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    2,529
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    I understand what you are saying, and yet those very genealogical passages are important in many ways. It reminds us that it is not just about laws, and it is not just about ideas, and it is not just about principals, it is about real people, people with parents and grandparents, it is about children and grandchildren, and it is about belonging. The begatitudes as I like to call them provide significant links to the continuity of God's care for his people, and now that we have the Epoch of Gilgamesh we also have some close parallels which really provide significant external support for the story of Abraham and the Abrahamic migration form Ur of the Chaldees. Clearly is Abraham came from that region, he would have carried with him, not simply bedding and a change of clothes, not simply camels and donkeys, but very significantly the stories, the traditions, and the stories of origin that had nurtured him.

    Even in Jesus time, you pedigree was part of your identity, and certified you as part of the story.

    So whilst in our time we may have lost some of the relevance, these stories were in the day of great significance, and even today they provide much in terms of us being able to earth this story, not as a myth, not as a philosophy, but as the veritable story of God's care for his people.
     
    Thomas Didymus and Shane R like this.