Anglican Church slammed for excluding same-sex spouses from 2020 conference [Reuters]

Discussion in 'Anglican and Christian News' started by World Press, Feb 26, 2019.

  1. World Press

    World Press Active Member

    Posts:
    372
    Likes Received:
    208
    Anglican Church slammed for excluding same-sex spouses from 2020 conference

    by Hugo Greenhalgh | @hugo_greenhalgh | Thomson Reuters Foundation
    Monday, 18 February 2019 16:50 GMT

    RTSYR0G.jpg

    LONDON, Feb 18 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Leading gay Christians have accused the Anglican Church of hypocrisy following its decision to ban same-sex spouses from attending the church's 2020 global conference.

    Canon Jeremy Pemberton, who in 2014 became the first Church of England priest to wed his same-sex partner, said the move to exclude LGBT+ spouses "panders to the views of the most extremely conservative" members of the Anglican Church.

    "I just think they increase public revulsion at their hypocrisy and their inability to treat people decently," he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation on Monday.

    "Imagine receiving an invitation (that says), 'By the way your spouse isn't allowed to come as they're the wrong gender.'

    "It's incredibly insulting and every LGBT person inside the Church of England and outside will be revolted by this kind of hypocritical and discriminatory behaviour."

    Pemberton's comments come after the secretary general of the Anglican Communion, Josiah Idowu-Fearon, published a blog on Friday that stated "it would be inappropriate for same-sex spouses to be invited to the conference".

    The Lambeth Conference, due to take place in Canterbury, England, is held once every 10 years. It brings together representatives of the 85 million-strong church, which has a presence in more than 165 countries around the world.

    The invitation process needed to take into account "the Anglican Communion's position on marriage which is that it is the lifelong union of a man and a woman", Idowu-Fearon wrote.


    Click here for the rest of the article:
    http://news.trust.org//item/20190218164100-yb5kz/
     
    Anglican04 likes this.
  2. Peteprint

    Peteprint Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    662
    Likes Received:
    578
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    High-Church Laudian
    If "the Anglican Communion's position on marriage...is that it is the lifelong union of a man and a woman," then individuals such as Rev. Pemberton should do the right thing and leave the Communion. What kind of person would join an organization that openly disagrees with their beliefs? The Modernist and Revisionist crowd whine about not being treated decently, and about the Church being hypocritical, yet they joined/remain in it even though they know its teachings. They are the true hypocrites, since they claim to be members of a body with who's teachings they disagree.
     
    dariakus likes this.
  3. Botolph

    Botolph Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    839
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    Whilst I take your point, I don't wholly concur. In the first instance the Communion is a membership body made up of Churches in the various outposts of what was once and empire. Those churches in the main are not per se membership churches, but rather churches that serve in the wider context of society. Our worship as such is public worship, not a private service. When it comes to marriage the individual churches have their own control of how they understand the rite/sacrament to be understood and administered. Yes it is a hot issue, with at least three churches I am aware of inside the communion have set in place provisions for single gender matrimony. Anglicans have always been bound together in diversity. For many I know that this is a step too far, which is why we have seen the rise of Alternative Anglican Groupings.

    The Latin Church has a top down autocratic structure, with an agree of leave sign on the door. Anglican Ecclesiology is in no way driven in the same way, for we have both Synods and Bishops, and authority is more difficult to define in an absolute sense.

    My view is that I concur with the sense of integrity suggesting that Lambeth 2020 spouses be understood in line with the tradition of the church more broadly, especially given that the matter is so hot, none the less I am less keen for us to take a Latin Autocratic style as the way to sort the issue. It has not worked in the past, and is unlikely to work in the future.
     
  4. Peteprint

    Peteprint Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    662
    Likes Received:
    578
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    High-Church Laudian
    I understand the point you are making, Botolph, but I think my comments would apply to other denominations as well. So often the revisionists cry about how they are being hurt, excluded, mistreated when, in fact, the churches involved are simply following their own written rules. The UMC is a case in point. They have a Book of Discipline. Of course they can change it, but until they do, the honorable thing is to obey it or leave.
     
  5. jschwartz

    jschwartz New Member

    Posts:
    25
    Likes Received:
    6
    I support same-sex marriage and ordination. However, there needs to be an understanding that this is offensive to Anglicans from the developing world, who are in a different place than the American church. In order to preserve unity in the Anglican Communion, this is an important step, and unfortunately, people will be hurt in the process. There's no way to avoid hurting people, on either front.
     

Share This Page