Why did "holy" go on holiday?

Discussion in 'Sacraments and Liturgy' started by Robert Lyon, Aug 20, 2017.

  1. Aidan

    Aidan Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    614
    Likes Received:
    365
    Country:
    N Ireland
    Religion:
    Traditional RomanCatholic
    Another filter, do you see a difference between capital c in Catholic and a small c?
     
  2. Philip Barrington

    Philip Barrington Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    507
    Likes Received:
    659
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    I have had a response.

    Yes this is a great puzzle. As far as I know it was the belief of Cranmer and others at the time of putting the first prayer books together that the word ‘holy’ had been added at a later time and so in the interests of purity they omitted it.​

    Here is the link to the site that he has been involved with, which many of you may find interesting. http://anglicaneucharistictheology.com/Anglican_Eucharistic_Theology/Welcome.html

    The difficulty of the proposition that Cranmer thought it was not part of the original, as I see it, is that we have no evidence of this, and the practice of the Church universal, beyond our tradition seems to suggest that the word holy in reference to the Church is indeed part of the original text of the Nicene Creed. I am not entirely sure that the argument stands up particularly well in light of the inclusion of the filioque clause which is clearly not part of the original text of the Nicene Creed, though it would have been in use in English liturgy post the Norman conquest.
     
  3. Philip Barrington

    Philip Barrington Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    507
    Likes Received:
    659
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    OHCA.jpg
     
    Aidan likes this.
  4. Robert Lyon

    Robert Lyon New Member

    Posts:
    8
    Likes Received:
    2
    Country:
    Canada
    Religion:
    ANiC

    Thanks for that, Philip.
    I really appreciate your interest in exploring this curio.
    Robert
     
  5. Philip Barrington

    Philip Barrington Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    507
    Likes Received:
    659
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    I am interested in this topic and hope that some people will have more to offer. I am off on vacation for 3 weeks - Edinburgh Oxford Dublin and not likely to get any free time to pursue it.
     
  6. Robert Lyon

    Robert Lyon New Member

    Posts:
    8
    Likes Received:
    2
    Country:
    Canada
    Religion:
    ANiC
    Enjoy over 'ome!
     
  7. Aidan

    Aidan Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    614
    Likes Received:
    365
    Country:
    N Ireland
    Religion:
    Traditional RomanCatholic
    This may be as far fetched as a wheelbarrow of manure fro China, but bare with me. What if Cranmer did not truly support Henry
    philip enjoy your tour of the British Isles
     
  8. Philip Barrington

    Philip Barrington Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    507
    Likes Received:
    659
    Country:
    Australia
    Religion:
    Anglican
    I think that we are all aware than Cranmer had more of a mind to reform than Henry VIII. They were both clearly strong willed, and so far as they could accommodate each other, they did, but they were not a doveset couple. Cranmer was the ArchBishop of Canterbury that facilitated the Kings passage through a number of marriages. The touch and go moment was following the death of Catherine of Aragon, the Pope could easily have opened the door, and history may well have been different.
     

Share This Page