The Church Catechism

Discussion in 'Announcements' started by Admin, Mar 25, 2013.

  1. SirPalomides

    SirPalomides Active Member

    Posts:
    101
    Likes Received:
    40
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    Could this be a dubious judgment disguised as a question?
     
  2. highchurchman

    highchurchman Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    706
    Likes Received:
    545
    Country:
    Britain
    Religion:
    Anglican/Catholic
    Take it which way you wish friend! Just how dubious the question is remains to be seen!
     
  3. highchurchman

    highchurchman Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    706
    Likes Received:
    545
    Country:
    Britain
    Religion:
    Anglican/Catholic
    Many thanks,

    All of which is true, the point you have made is known and accepted. Never the less, it is generally agreed that the result is accepted as the Nicene Creed by the Church and that the idea of every particular church working out its own, or additions to the Nice is frowned upon. The point still stands that a major portion, in importance if not volume of the Roman Catechism is the position of the papacy! Which Anglicans of that time classed as a ,'robber', Council.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2014
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  4. SirPalomides

    SirPalomides Active Member

    Posts:
    101
    Likes Received:
    40
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    I would agree with you that Papal supremacy is an unwarranted addition to the deposit of faith. With regards to the Nicene creed though, it seems that all the Western churches, the Anglicans included, have accepted the filioque which was added without the warrant of any ecumenical council.
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  5. Spherelink

    Spherelink Active Member

    Posts:
    545
    Likes Received:
    237
    Religion:
    Unhinged SC Anglican
    "and the Communion of Saints" was injected into the Creed at some point (after the 4th century), but I don't see a big ruckus being raised about that.
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  6. SirPalomides

    SirPalomides Active Member

    Posts:
    101
    Likes Received:
    40
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    That's in the Apostles Creed, not the Nicene creed.
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  7. Spherelink

    Spherelink Active Member

    Posts:
    545
    Likes Received:
    237
    Religion:
    Unhinged SC Anglican
    Right, and my point still stands. Since we adhere to the 3 creeds it's should be equally problematic to add to any of them.
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  8. SirPalomides

    SirPalomides Active Member

    Posts:
    101
    Likes Received:
    40
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    Neither the Apostles creed nor the Athanasian creed were sanctioned by ecumenical councils. Only the Nicene creed can really lay claim to universal authority in the church, since the other two were pretty much unknown in the east.
     
  9. Spherelink

    Spherelink Active Member

    Posts:
    545
    Likes Received:
    237
    Religion:
    Unhinged SC Anglican
    I don't know what you mean.. the Apostles Creed is the central creed in the anglican liturgy and was ways received universally. Likewise for the Athanasian one. Hence why they're called the 3 Ecumenical Creeds that unite creedal Christianity.
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  10. SirPalomides

    SirPalomides Active Member

    Posts:
    101
    Likes Received:
    40
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Orthodox Christian
    My point is, the Apostles creed and that Athanasian creed did not enjoy "massive popularity" except in the West. Unfortunately the East did not have much knowledge of Latin patristics- for instance, very few in the East had any familiarity with St. Augustine's writings. Likewise the West was not very well versed in the Greek fathers. Also, the filioque may be scripturally sound in some interpretations of it, but the whole start of this discussion was about additions to the creed not authorized by ecumenical councils, and the filioque was definitely such an addition, which is why, for instance, Pope Leo III fought really hard to keep it out and had the Nicene creed inscribed on silver shields, in both Latin and Greek, without the filioque.
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  11. Peteprint

    Peteprint Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    526
    Likes Received:
    482
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    High-Church Laudian, APA
    As a student of Church history I am familiar with the Apostle's Creed and the Athanasian, but growing up a Baptist I had no idea any creeds existed. When I converted to Orthodoxy I learned the Nicene Creed, which is the only one we ever usesans the filioque .
     
    Scottish Monk likes this.
  12. highchurchman

    highchurchman Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    706
    Likes Received:
    545
    Country:
    Britain
    Religion:
    Anglican/Catholic
    The Apostles Creed is dated from the earliest times as a Baptismal Creed and it is sanctioned by antiquity and constant use. It is of course western but there have been no serious complaints . Moss claims that the Athanasian Creed is not a proper creed at all, beginning as it does "Who so ever wishes to be saved." Whereas, I believe, ' Credo,' commences the other two. The Athanasian Creed had its beginning according to Moss about 400 A.D.

    Niceae is of course the universal creed as we have already been told.
     
    MWDavis and Scottish Monk like this.
  13. Scottish Monk

    Scottish Monk Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    433
    Likes Received:
    300
    Country:
    USA
    Religion:
    Christian
    Good discussion. At home in my cell, I exclusively use the Apostles Creed in my personal liturgy.
     

Share This Page