Impressive early description of the Liturgy, in Apostolic Constitutions

Discussion in 'Liturgy, and Book of Common Prayer' started by Toma, Nov 7, 2012.

  1. Toma

    Toma Well-Known Member Anglican

    Posts:
    1,402
    Likes Received:
    1,129
    Country:
    Canada
    Religion:
    Anglican
    If you're inclined to learn the worship of God as it was practised closest to the time of the Apostles, it would do well to read the Apostolic Constitutions. They're not actually by the Apostles, but certainly antedate A.D. 400, so they are a valuable source of the patristic mindset.

    Book II, chapter 7 is especially germane to the Eucharist. These are a set of instructions to a bishop on how to gather on that solemn occasion.

    http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf07.ix.iii.vii.html

    1. They assumed seating, unlike the prevailing Orthodox mindset.
    2. They assumed many deacons, to guard and order the pews - unlike our more liturgical ideal for them.
    3. They assumed deaconesses, ministering to the women separately.
    4. They assumed some sort of special vestment apparently?
    5. All was expected to be strictly quiet, in good order, and well-arranged by the usher-like deacons.
    6. The church was always to point toward the east, if possible.
    7. Only deacons stood, to represent their continual service.
    8. The clergy sat in the middle of the nave, presumably at a desk or lectern symbolizing the mast of a ship.

    Readings in order:

    (A processional entrance psalm or psalms)

    1. Old Testament
    2. More Old Testament
    3. A Psalm or Psalms
    4. From Acts
    5. From an Epistle
    6. Gospel, all standing.

    It's nothing like any of our services, reformed, roman, or eastern: for they had even more scripture. :D

    1. A series of short homilies by each of the clergy, forming a whole?
    2. Interesting that the deacons had to watch over everyone in their several places - rambunctious? ;)
    3. Sermon(s) was a time of great and solemn silence, so as to receive life-edifying instruction. Good advice.
    4. We aren't to be comfortable, but well-ordered, packed in, and meek like sheep.

    1. Beginning to look "towards the east" assumes they had been looking at the central lectern or pulpit?
    2. Non-baptized, and the penitents who had been allowed to stay, were dismissed before Communion.
    3. Some of the deacons did attend to the altar, though most kept to the pews to keep order.
    4. The sign of peace, an intimate kiss, was separated by sex. No young couples making out for 5 minutes!

    1. "The deacon" - perhaps an head of the college of deacons? - says a sort of high bidding prayer.
    2. "The High Priest" being the celebrant? The bishop?
    3. The Mosaic benediction is not abolished - symbolizing their belief that the old priesthood did not die?
    4. The Eucharist is The Sacrifice, and The Oblation - what is a sacrifice and an offering for, but sin?
    5. Each sex and order of age-group approached in good order. How unlike today!
    6. They practised closed communion, no open table. All were examined and known.

    I personally note a marked similarity to the 1979 BCP, 1969 Roman Mass, and others which utilize this newly-discovered (liturgically-speaking) material. The 1962 Canadian BCP, in adding optional psalms between readings, was being more faithful to the early Church than to Romanism. Bravo, Anglicans.
     
  2. Scottish Knight

    Scottish Knight Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    498
    Likes Received:
    569
    Country:
    Scotland
    Religion:
    Christian
    Fascinating glimpse there. The symbolism of the ship is very interesting. When I was in Beirut I remember a Maronite church built in the shape of a ship and the melkite logo has a ship in it (see below)

    [​IMG]

    So in the East the ship symbolism seems to have been kept in some areas. I wonder if it was merely to represent order or wther it had soem other significance. Also interesting the references to the high priest. Was this written by predominantly Jewish Christians? Or did gentile churches adopt the Jewish terms for things? also how much were services ordered throughout the Church, was there much devation from this setting? Time to do some research...
     
    Seeker and Toma like this.
  3. Scottish Knight

    Scottish Knight Well-Known Member

    Posts:
    498
    Likes Received:
    569
    Country:
    Scotland
    Religion:
    Christian
    The fact the apostolic constitutions claim to be written by the apostles themselves althouggh dating from the 4th century does make it slightly suspicious to me Could this be some fringe group in the church? whoever wrote them didn't seem that honest:think: Some of the details are confirmed in Justin's account too from the 2nd century:

    On the day called Sunday thete is a meeting of all believers who live in the town or the country, and the memoirs of the apostles, or the writings of the prophets, are read for as long as time will permit. When the reader has finished, the president in a sermon urges and invites the people to base their lives on these noble things. Then we all stand up and offer prayers. When our prayer is concluded, bread and wine and water are brought; and the president offers up prayers and thanksgivings to the best of his ability, and the people assent with amen. Then follows the distribution of the things over which thanks have been offered, and the partaking of them by all; and the deacons take them to those who are absent...

    and Needham again quotes from a different writing of Justin for a more in depth dexcription of Communion:

    Then the bread and a cup of wine mixed with water are brought to the president of the brothers. He takes them and offers up praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and the Holy Spirit. He gives thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things from His hands. When he has finished the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their joyful agreement by saying amen...Then those whom we call deacons give to each of those present the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and carry away a portion o those who were absent

    We call this food "Eucharist", which no-one is allowed to share unless he believes that the things we teach are true, and has been washed with the washing that is for forgiveness of sins and a second birth, and is living as Christ has commanded.
    (2000 years of Christ's power" vol 1 N R Needham, p69)

    While not as detailed we can still see the role of deacon in the service and a lot of reading from scripture it also reads more personally as the people expressing "their joyful agreement" shows. Really get a sense of what it must have been like then
     
    Toma likes this.